AIIMS2009Chemistry-Organic Chemistry

AIIMS 2009 Chemistry Aromatic Compounds Assertion Reason Question

Type: Assertion Reason-conceptual-Medium-Class 11

Assertion : p-N,N⁻dimethylaminobenzaldehyde undergoes benzoin condensation. Reason : The aldehydic (-CHO) group is meta directing.

A

Both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion

B

Both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion

C

Assertion is true but reason is false

D

Both assertion and reason are false

Correct Answer

Option B

Detailed Explanation

To understand the question, let's break down the assertion and reason provided, and then analyze why the correct answer is option B.

Assertion:

p-N,N⁻dimethylaminobenzaldehyde undergoes benzoin condensation.

Explanation: Benzoin condensation is a reaction where two molecules of an aldehyde condense in the presence of a base to form a β-hydroxy ketone (benzoin). In this case, p-N,N⁻dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, which has an aldehyde group (-CHO) attached to a benzene ring substituted with a dimethylamino group, can participate in this reaction. The dimethylamino group is an electron-donating group and activates the aromatic ring, making the aldehyde group more reactive towards nucleophilic attack.

Thus, the assertion is true.

Reason:

The aldehydic (-CHO) group is meta directing.

Explanation: In electrophilic aromatic substitution, the directing effects of substituents are crucial. Electron-donating groups, like the dimethylamino group, are typically ortho/para-directing due to their ability to stabilize the carbocation intermediate formed during the reaction. The aldehydic (-CHO) group, however, is a deactivating group and does not direct substitution effectively. This is often misunderstood; while the -CHO group can influence the reactivity, it does not direct substitutions to the meta position effectively.

Therefore, the reason provided is false because the -CHO group is actually a deactivating group and does not direct substitution to the meta position. Instead, it typically directs to the ortho or para positions relative to the electron-donating group.

Conclusion:

Since the assertion is true and the reason is false, the correct answer is option B: "Both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion."

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

  • Option A: Both assertion and reason are true, and reason is the correct explanation of assertion. This is incorrect because the reason is false.
  • Option C: Assertion is true but reason is false. This option does not match the wording of option B, which accurately describes the situation.
  • Option D: Both assertion and reason are false. This is incorrect because the assertion is true.

Key Concepts:

  • Benzoin Condensation: A reaction involving the dimerization of aldehydes in the presence of a base.
  • Directing Effects: The influence of substituents on the position of further substitutions on the aromatic ring. Electron-donating groups direct substitutions to ortho/para positions, while electron-withdrawing groups generally deactivate the ring and do not lead to meta substitution.

In summary, the assertion about p-N,N⁻dimethylaminobenzaldehyde undergoing benzoin condensation is valid, while the reasoning about the meta-directing nature of the -CHO group is flawed. Thus, the correct answer remains option B.

Found an issue with this question?