MarksRiser
MarksRiser
RE-NEET2026Physics-Modern Physics

RE-NEET 2026 Physics Photoelectric Effect MCQ Question

Type: MCQ-diagram based-Medium-Class 12

A beam of light falls on a metal surface such that photo-electrons are generated. If power of the light source starts to decrease linearly with time t, then variation of the photocurrent I and magnitude of the stopping potential |V| with time is best represented by :

A
Option A
B
Option B
C
Option C
D
Option D

Correct Answer

Option D

Detailed Explanation

To understand the behavior of photocurrent II and the magnitude of the stopping potential ∣V∣|V| as the power of the light source decreases linearly with time, we must first delve into the fundamentals of the photoelectric effect.

The Photoelectric Effect

When light shines on a metal surface, it can cause the ejection of electrons from that surface. This phenomenon is known as the photoelectric effect. The key concepts include:

  1. Photon Energy: The energy of each photon is given by

u $$ where hh is Planck's constant and u u is the frequency of the light.

  1. Work Function: This is the minimum energy required to eject an electron from the surface of the metal, denoted as ϕ\phi.

  2. Photoelectric Current: The photocurrent II is directly proportional to the number of photoelectrons emitted per unit time. Thus, it is also proportional to the intensity (or power) of the light striking the surface.

  3. Stopping Potential: The stopping potential VV is the potential required to stop the fastest emitted photoelectrons. The maximum kinetic energy KmaxK_{\text{max}} of the emitted electrons is given by:

u - \phi Thestoppingpotentialisrelatedtothemaximumkineticenergyby: The stopping potential is related to the maximum kinetic energy by: e |V| = K_{\text{max}} $$ where ee is the charge of an electron.

Analyzing the Given Situation

In this scenario, we are told that the power P(t)P(t) of the light source is decreasing linearly over time, expressed as: P(t)=P0−ktP(t) = P_0 - kt where P0P_0 is the initial power, kk is a positive constant, and tt is time.

  1. Photocurrent II: Since the photocurrent is proportional to the intensity (or power) of the light, we can express this relationship as: I(t)∝P(t)I(t) \propto P(t) Thus, as the power decreases linearly with time, the photocurrent will also decrease linearly: I(t)=I0−ctI(t) = I_0 - ct for some constant cc.

  2. Stopping Potential ∣V∣|V|: The stopping potential depends on the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons. As the power decreases, the number of emitted photoelectrons also decreases, but the energy of each individual photon remains constant (assuming the frequency of light does not change). Therefore, the stopping potential will not change until the intensity drops below a certain threshold, at which point no electrons are emitted.

    However, as the current decreases (because fewer electrons are emitted), we observe that ∣V∣|V| remains constant until the power reaches a point where it can no longer release electrons, at which point ∣V∣|V| will drop to zero. Thus, the stopping potential stays constant at a higher value until the threshold power is reached, after which it drops.

Conclusion

In essence, the variation of photocurrent II and the magnitude of the stopping potential ∣V∣|V| can be summarized as follows:

  • Photocurrent II: Decreases linearly with time.
  • Stopping Potential ∣V∣|V|: Remains constant until the photocurrent reaches zero, then drops to zero.

Thus, the correct representation of the variation of II and ∣V∣|V| over time is best represented by:

Correct Answer: D

Clarification of Other Options

If the options provided included graphical representations, we would find that:

  • Option A might suggest an exponential decay, which is incorrect as the photocurrent decreases linearly with power.
  • Option B might depict ∣V∣|V| also decreasing linearly, which is incorrect since ∣V∣|V| remains constant until a threshold is reached.
  • Option C could misrepresent the relationship between II and ∣V∣|V| as being inversely related, which is not the case.

In conclusion, understanding the relationships between power, current, and stopping potential is crucial in analyzing the photoelectric effect and interpreting the question correctly.

Found an issue with this question?