AIIMS 2017 Chemistry Isomerism in Coordination Compounds Assertion Reason Question
Assertion (A): Complexes of and type ( and are unidentate) do not show geometrical isomerism.
Reason (R): Geometrical isomerism is not shown by complexes of coordination number 6.
Both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
Both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
Assertion is true but Reason is false
Both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct Answer
Detailed Explanation
Option C is correct because the assertion that complexes of MX₆ and MX₃L do not show geometrical isomerism is true; these complexes typically adopt octahedral or trigonal planar geometries, which do not allow for isomerism due to their symmetrical arrangements. However, the reason provided is false because geometrical isomerism can occur in coordination complexes with coordination numbers of 4 and 6, but it specifically requires certain ligand arrangements, such as in square planar (for coordination number 4) or octahedral (for coordination number 6) geometries.
Option A is incorrect because, while the assertion is true, the reason is not a correct explanation. Option B is incorrect for the same reason; both statements cannot be true if the reason does not explain the assertion. Option D is incorrect as the assertion is indeed true.
Found an issue with this question?
Related Questions
More from Coordination Compounds
More from 2017
The proper combination of 3 NOT gate and 1 NAND gate is shown. If $A = 0, B = 1, C = 1$ then the output of the combination is,
**Assertion:** For looping a vertical loop of radius $r$, the minimum velocity at the lowest point should be $\sqrt{5gr}$. **Reason:** In this even t...